|
Post by oogleschnook on Apr 13, 2014 22:23:03 GMT
Be very interested to hear peoples thoughts on this as it's something we are going to need to rethink soon.
We have been always pretty proactive about not letting our LOs be in photos or if they are making sure they don't put them on Facebook. For nursery and school we've always said no photos.
However, now LOs are getting to an age where they are becoming aware of this and if they were to ask why they can't be in photos I really don't know what we'd say that wouldn't completely freak them out. Also not sure if we need to be this cautious or not and don't want them to miss out if not....
I know everyone's situations are different, but would be great to hear others thoughts!
|
|
|
Post by pingu on Apr 13, 2014 23:29:25 GMT
Initially we were very strict about photos because it was thought ds2 bf might threaten placement if he came around. But nothing ever happened, and once ds2 became old enough to be embarrassed about standing out at school, we asked photographer to let him in, but position him is here he wouldn't be too obvious. We eventually loosened it for local things like school special events in local paper. As it's unlikely bf would see this.
I also asked the scout troop leader to not post anything online, but said that I was fine with photos in the scout hall.
I think you have to weigh up your own risk level.
|
|
|
Post by moo on Apr 14, 2014 4:57:42 GMT
Still very cautious here....
b.f. always been a massive threat.... baa particularly can remember lots of the awful stuff from when a baby So it has been easy to use that to explain why they can't be in photos ( I have always reassured lots about why stuff was bad & not safe etc ).... It doesn't freak them out in any way... It is good for them to understand why something has to be the way it is.... They now tell staff & photographer & either help on the day or get Xtra time reading or on the pooter ( which they love )
I think telling them the truth important & I have always found a way to explain at whatever the age in age appropriate way... Never been a prob here hth....
xx. moo. Xx
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2014 14:42:26 GMT
In the early stages I used to be far more cautious, but got less and less so as the years went on.
Unless your BF live nearby, the chances of them seeing any school photo's are really slim. As long as the children are nit named and they are just general photo's I don't see much risk and think singling out your child to be excluded from the group photo's may do more harm than good IMO.
|
|
|
Post by flowerpower on Apr 14, 2014 15:49:08 GMT
We tend to try and not get to freaked out about photo always happier if it is not the two of them together always more identifiable when together but very hard to control as they get older
|
|
|
Post by serrakunda on Apr 14, 2014 17:10:37 GMT
I don't have any problem with photos being taken and used for school purposes. I requested no photos on school website , Facebook etc, not for any particular adoption security issues. It's more that I'm old Luddite, I don't understand the need to have every second of your child's life plastered all over social media and have more concerns about unsavoury people trawling the web for photos of children for other purposes, rather than birth mum
|
|
|
Post by pluto on Apr 14, 2014 17:28:08 GMT
I allow all, as I believe if they really want they can find you anyway. I also think only 0.1 % of the adopted cases are at real risk from birth families, than the court will be involved in protection, names fully changed etc. The real risk starts when children have internet access and mess around on social media sites, than the kids make contact, much more tricky and dangerous. So a photo? in the worst case the birth family post it on their face book site, who cares if you never look you won't know and soon it is gone into the media soup and everyone has forgotten.
|
|
|
Post by wibbley on Apr 14, 2014 19:38:24 GMT
Photos but no name here.
|
|
|
Post by kstar on Apr 14, 2014 22:42:07 GMT
So far I haven't allowed anything but Starlet is getting quite upset about it - I hadn't said anything to her but she asked me the other day why I don't love her enough to want to show her off on Facebook like her cousins :-( I have temporary solved that one by setting up a secret fb page and posting loads of photos on there - she hasn't got a clue that it's secret anyway. In terms of school I have said no for this year but will relax that now AO is through and I am generally more relaxed about everything! They have a strict no name, age or year group policy on the website so she would be hard to trace.
Off the back of other people's experiences on here, I am refusing to send photos with letterbox - Starlets appearance has changed so much I think some BF members wouldn't recognise her in the street now.
|
|
|
Post by chotimonkey on Apr 15, 2014 6:12:06 GMT
Ours are quite little and it is thought that BP's aren't an abduction or violent risk. They are also out of area are gently cautious...
We do let nursery take end of term pics and email them to other parents, but have asked that the email states not to upload them to any social media site as nursery policy, rather than singling out Squirrel and Howler as the reason not to. One of George's messy play groups takes a pic of each chd with their art every week and emails it to the parent, they are not used anywhere else... That's fine by me. Our baby yoga group has a photographer mum who takes the most beautiful pics for the website... She gives any v obvious ones of Howler to me personally and the leader is v understanding and will check if a pic of Howler is ok to use on her FB page... Howler tucked away in the background or from an angle where her face isn't distinct is usually fine by me.
I photograph the kids all the time, I can't help it, they are so gorgeous and I'm a terrible 'sharent' I have a secret group on Facebook where only selected people can see, I post pics there.and that's where anyone who wants to post pics of my children can post them, only there not on the main site And friends and family have been v good about not putting pics of my children anywhere else. We also use Whatsapp with my family and we all post pics and videos in our private conversations... No pics in contact letters and I send postcard pictures of our kids for stuff like valentines and thank you cards, but always put them in envelopes rather than sending them as postcards.
|
|
|
Post by chotimonkey on Apr 15, 2014 6:14:35 GMT
Should have said that all children were placed in care from birth and contact was limited, we are also out I of area and I'm more wary about George who still looks a little babyish than the girls... You'd struggle to match Howler or Squirrel to their early baby photos.
|
|
|
Post by milly on Apr 20, 2014 23:14:51 GMT
I don't worry re the actual photos and never have as mine were last seen by bf as babies and there are no known security risks. However they both have unusual first names so we don't allow names to be published with the photos if they are anywhere on the internet. So I don't put their photos on Facebook, not that I use it much. There is face recognition software apparently - and dd1 looks remarkably like her bm, and I wouldn't want bm to trace her, though from what I know that seems unlikely. We don't have a photo of dd2's bm, although her sw said she looks nothing like her, but we also know very little about her or rest of family, so they could be trawling for her name.
|
|
|
Post by scaredycats on Dec 12, 2016 12:57:32 GMT
Just learnt that BM has moved to our area. Friends and family know not to post any photos on social media. Birth family considered low risk. Think we'll just have to keep on reviewing the situation as time goes by and keep getting advice, including from you guys.
|
|
|
Post by mudlark on Dec 12, 2016 21:41:25 GMT
How worrying for you that BM has moved nearby. Personally I have always told pre school/school/any parties they go to, to please not put any photos on any website or use for any publicity material. We can't keep it totally under control but can give it a good try.
|
|